Resonance. James Batchelor + Collaborators

My review of Resonance was published online by Canberra CityNews on 11 October 2025. The review below is a slightly enlarged version of the CityNews post. Here is a link to the CityNews review.

***********************************

10 October 2025. Courtyard Studio, Canberra Theatre Centre

Choreographer James Batchelor has a particular interest in how approaches to dance are passed down from generation to generation. Audiences caught a glimpse of that interest relatively recently in 2022-2023 with Batchelor’s production, Short Cuts to Familiar Places. It focused on the work of Gertrud Bodenwieser, and those who worked with and were influenced by her in Australia. Its Canberra showing is reviewed at this link.

Resonance continues Batchelor’s interest in how movement is passed on across generations. It focuses on the legacy of the late dancer and choreographer, Tanja Liedtke, who was tragically killed in a road accident in 2007 just as she was about to take on the directorship of Sydney Dance Company.

Batchelor’s work is never straightforward and in fact it creates a multitude of potential meanings, both as his works progress and after the show is over. This characteristic is very much on show in Resonance

Resonance was an immersive work with the audience seated in a single row around the edges of the performing space. As we entered the space we noticed the performers, who represented three dance generations, sitting on the floor ready to start the show. The work proper began with members of the cast, in particular those who had worked with or known Liedtke in some way, taking a microphone and delivering short comments (sometimes difficult to hear clearly unfortunately) on their impressions of her and her work. Some accompanied their spoken comments with movement or poses they recalled from Liedtke’s work.

Kristina Chan with microphone in Resonance, Canberra 2025. Photo: © Olivia Wikner

Slowly the rest of the cast rose from where they were seated and began to dance. The movement was gentle, curved and liquid in its flow. But, as the work progressed, individual comments became in a kind of second section—a conversation between various dancers—and the movement became faster and more dramatic (and perhaps a little too long).

In a third and final section in the development of Resonance, the verbal comments ceased and the choreography became stronger, and even more dramatic and powerful. At times the choreography was quite static and danced by just a small group until the final moments when the full cast filled the performing space with determined, fast, furious, and individualistic movement.

Final moments from Resonance, Canberra 2025. Photo: © Olivia Wikner

Various media comments about Resonance have suggested that Batchelor’s choreography for the work is meditative. But for me it wasn’t the choreography that was meditative, it was the development of Batchelor’s thoughts about Liedtke that had that particular quality. Those thoughts moved from Batchelor’s initial speculations about her approach, to his final feeling that her legacy was a powerful addition to dance in Australia.

As far as the choreography was concerned, I wondered whether some of it was improvisation, and also how much of it came from Batchelor and how much from the dancers themselves. It was highly individualistic, sometimes even uncanny in its structure. It always seemed to reflect the particular skills of each dancer rather than those of a single choreographer.

I was especially impressed by the dancer Anton who was totally and utterly involved throughout, whether he was performing dancerly movement or an occasional series of gymnastic-style steps (such as push-ups). Kristina Chan also attracted my attention with her beautiful fluid approach to movement.

A driving score from Morgan Hickinbotham gave the work added strength. Costumes designed by one of the dancers, Theo Clinkard, left me wondering a little. I’m not sure why they were a combination of daytime leisure gear with translucent chiffon-style drapes added occasionally. The additions were quite beautiful but I’m not sure about the meaning they were meant to arouse.

Emma Batchelor wearing Theo Clinkard’s full costume in Resonance, Canberra 2025. Photo: © Olivia Wikner

I didn’t know Liedtke or her work, other than through a streamed version from 2017 of Construct. But Resonance suggests to me that she was highly unconventional, perhaps even enigmatic in her approaches to dance. Resonance was like a wake-up call encouraging us to look further into her background and approach. 

James Batchelor in a moment from Resonance,
Canberra 2025. Photo: © Olivia Wikner

Michelle Potter, 12 October 2025

I was a guest of James Batchelor + Collaborators/Canberra Theatre Centre at this performance.

Resonance was supported by the Tanja Liedtke Foundation and other organisations. It featured dancers from across generations including, in the case of the Canberra production, dancers from the Quantum Leap Youth Ensemble

Featured image: James Batchelor with Chloe Chignell in a moment from
Resonance, Sydney 2025. Photo: © @wendellt

Ballet and books in Brisbane

Dangerous Liaisons. Queensland Ballet
4 October 2025 (evening). Talbot Theatre, Thomas Dixon Centre, Brisbane

I was not invited to review Liam Scarlett’s Dangerous Liaisons in its 2025 revival by Queensland Ballet so I felt no reason to stay when I disliked what I was watching. I left at interval. It was just the third time in about 35 years of reviewing dance performances across Australia and around the world that I have left a dance performance before it was over. Why on this occasion?

The work Dangerous Liaisons is based on the 1782 novel Les Liaisons dangereuses by Pierre Choderlos de Laclos. But on the whole this 2025 presentation reminded me of a musical comedy item with an emphasis on sexual activities. The movements and gestures indicating sexual desire were obvious and a highly dominant feature throughout (the first act at least).

Fine re the sexual emphasis. That’s part of the story! But who were all those characters? With one or two exceptions it was not at all clear, as the complex narrative unfolded, who individual dancers were representing. Understanding the action and the multitude of characters taking the stand, as it were, was made more difficult by the lack of any form of easily available written material. We all know that explanations and descriptions of works these days are available online via a QR code, but in the olden days of Queensland Ballet a sheet of paper with brief but vital information of cast and storyline was always available. Even a full printed program was also there for those who wanted one. And how frustrating it is when the person sitting next to you turns on a mobile phone to check something out in the middle of the performance.

I have to mention that there was some excellent dancing being presented, including some group scenes even if it wasn’t clear what was being celebrated or criticised. In particular Georgia Swan was outstanding as the leading female character, the wealthy widow, the Marquise de Merteuil. There was also a male dancer who did not have a major role but whose performance attracted my attention. His technique was excellent but it was his onstage presence, including the manner in which he connected with the audience, that was thrilling to watch. But who was he? I can’t recall having seen him before but I had no way of knowing immediately who he is as there were no photographs of the dancers that were easily available. I should add here that, as I was waiting for a taxi to take me back to my hotel, several people came to the desk in the foyer—it was interval—asking for a printed item of information. They were advised to go and open the QR code!

Georgia Swan in Liam Scarlett’s Dangerous Liaisons. Queensland Ballet, 2025. Photo: © David Kelly

It was also, I believe, a really bad move by Queensland Ballet to use recorded music. Someone surely must realise that resident conductor Nigel Gaynor has always had a major input into performances he conducts. He works with what is happening onstage, including how the dancers are performing, in a way that no recording can do (even though the recording used in the 2025 presentation was a recording conducted by Gaynor, it’s just not the same). To make matters worse Gaynor is leaving his post as conductor at the end of 2025. Although I am not entirely clear about the reasons for the move, it apparently has something to do with the financial situation in which Queensland Ballet finds itself. (Happy to be corrected here if I am totally wrong re the reason).

I attended Dangerous Liaisons as a member of the general public. My ticket cost $127. Read my review of the 2019 production of Dangerous Liaisons, to which I was invited and which I thought was exceptional. Here is the link.

See below for a list of publications in which my dance writing and reviews have been published (in addition to the material I have posted on this website since I set it up in 2009).*

The books

But all was not lost. While in Brisbane I visited that amazing second hand book shop, Archives Fine Books in Charlotte Street in the city’s CBD. I have never really been in a second hand bookshop that has such a wealth of items on every imaginable subject. I ended up buying four dance books, three of which were previously unknown to me, and one of which was a book about an exhibition that had a major impact on our understanding of the activities of Serge Diaghilev. The books are:

  • Buckle, Richard. In Search of Diaghilev (London: Sidgwick and Jackson, 1955)
    Collins, Richard. Behind the Bolshoi Curtain (London: William Kimber, 1974)
    Dodd, Craig. The Performing World of the Dancer (London: Breslich & Foss, 1981)
    La Fosse, Robert (with Andrew Mark Wentink). Nothing to Hide (New York: Donald I. Fine Inc., 1987)

I started my reading with Behind the Bolshoi Curtain and was instantly taken by the personal manner in which Englishman Richard Collins, who spent four years working in Moscow with various sections of the Bolshoi school and company, interacted with his Russian colleagues and vice-versa. There were some issues that were a little concerning (if interesting in a particular way) but it was a ‘can’t put down’ book in the way it showed a side of ballet and dancers that we don’t usually read about in other Bolshoi-focused publications. I am looking forward to moving on to Richard Buckle’s work on his 1950s exhibition on Diaghilev’s contribution to our understanding of the Ballets Russes.

Michelle Potter, 6 October 2025

Featured image: Cover of Richard Collins’ Behind the Bolshoi Curtain.


*Here is a list of the magazines, newspapers and journals in which my reviews have appeared:

The Australian, Australian Art Review, Australian Book Review, Ballet News, Brolga, The Bulletin, Canberra CityNews, The Canberra Times, Choreography and Dance, Current News from the Library for the Performing Arts, Dance Australia, Dance Chronicle, Dance Forum, Dance Research, DanceTabs (formerly ballet.co.uk), The Dancing Times, Jahresmitteilungen von Tanzplan Deutschland, Journal of the Australian Society of Archivists, Limelight, Muse, Museum National, The National Library of Australia Magazine, National Library of Australia News, The Sydney Morning Herald and Voices.

There are other lists of books I have written as well as lists of chapters in books and theatre programs in which my writing has appeared. In addition, there are hundreds of posts on this website, which this year has, according to Google Analytics, already received 105,000 visits from Australia and across the world. I’m just not sure why Queensland Ballet no longer regards me as a critic worthy of an invitation to review.

Les Patineurs. The Royal Ballet

via the ROH streaming platform

Frederick Ashton’s 1937 creation, Les Patineurs (The Skaters), was first seen in Australia (as far as I am aware) in 1958 during the Royal Ballet’s tour to Australia and New Zealand. It entered the repertoire of the Australian Ballet in 1970 when it was first seen in Adelaide and then in various Australian venues. Below are two images from the 1958 Royal Ballet production in Australia, taken by Walter Stringer and now part of the collection in the National Library of Australia (NLA), and two from the 1970 Australian Ballet production, again by Walter Stringer in the NLA collection.* LInks to the NLA catalogue are also below.


I first saw Les Patineurs in Australia in 1970, a long time ago now, but can’t really remember if I saw it again somewhere. So I was pleased to be able to go to the ROH site to remind myself, not so much of the ‘story’ (which is quite slight and not really the main focus of the work), but of the choreography.

The production on the streaming platform is a filmed version of a Royal Ballet production from 2010 and I was thrilled, to tell the truth, to see who was dancing in that production. The Blue Boy, who takes on some of the most challenging of Ashton’s choreographic input, was Steven McRae, seen in the featured image to this post. I have admired McRae’s dancing for a number of years now. I really didn’t see much of him until around 2016 and onwards so it was interesting to see him in an earlier stage of his career. After a bit of research I discovered he was promoted to principal with the Royal in 2009 and his exceptional technique was well and truly visible in 2010.

His solo as the Blue Boy had some unusual moments. In particular there was a section or two where he performed a series of entrechats when his legs, rather than opening to the side to execute the crossing of the limbs, opened to the front/back. It was surprising to see this variation on the much-performed entrechat.

His technical strength was again exceptionally obvious in the closing moments of the production when he executed a long series of fouettés and grands pirouettes à la seconde, which he was required to continue until the curtain had fallen at the end of the performance.

But not only was McRae technically strong, his characterisation was thoroughly engaging as well.

While perhaps it was McRae who stole the show for me, it was a treat to see other Royal Ballet dancers in relatively early stages of their career development. Sarah Lamb for example was beautiful to watch in the pas de deux with Rupert Pennefather as was Akane Takada, whose work I have also enjoyed over several years. Takada performed as one of the Blue Girls. Then of course there was Liam Scarlett, whose career in Australia and New Zealand gave so many of us so much pleasure. Scarlett danced as one of the ensemble of skaters.

Samantha Raine and Akane Takada as the Blue Girls in Frederick Ashton’s Les Patineurs. The Royal Ballet 2010. Photo: The Royal Ballet streaming platform.

While Les Patineurs may not be one of Ashton’s most deeply affecting narrative works, choreographically it shows Ashton’s uncompromising approach to movement and his sense of attack, choreographic attack that is. This 2010 production was a huge pleasure to watch and opened up for me various avenues of research. The streaming also offers three extra short examinations of aspects of the work, including an interview with McRae and one with Lamb and Pennefather on various aspects of Ashton’s approach. Well worth watching.

Les Patineurs, 2010.

Michelle Potter, 28 September 2025

Featured image: Steven McRae as the Blue Boy in Frederick Ashton’s Les Patineurs. The Royal Ballet 2010. Photo: The Royal Ballet streaming platform.

*Only head and shoulder shots from 1970 by Walter Stringer are currently available (or suitable) for reproduction.


Postscript: Putting it mildly, I was surprised to read the following ‘AI overview’ after I entered ‘Liam Scarlett Les Patineurs’ into a search engine:

‘Liam Scarlett choreographed the ballet Les Patineurs for The Royal Ballet, which premiered in 2010. He was a British choreographer who had a successful career, but died by suicide in April 2021 following allegations of sexual misconduct.’

Everything in the first sentence is incorrect and, just to comment further on the wording above, it is a direct copy and paste from what emerged from my online query. AI is a worry that’s for sure!

Duck Pond. Circa

18 September 2025. The Playhouse, Canberra Theatre Centre

Circa’s latest production, Duck Pond, is advertised as a reimagining of the ballet Swan Lake, a reimagining of that longstanding, much-loved ballet as a circus spectacular. Other moments in the narrative, we are told, make reference to the work of Hans Christian Andersen, in particular The Ugly Duckling.

The narrative follows the activities of a Prince who meets the Ugly Duckling and briefly falls in love, but then out of love, with this character. There is a pillow fight in which feathers fall from the pillows and cover the floor. They are swept up by a ‘duck army’. The Black Swan appears and the Prince falls for her. But when the duckling turns into a swan and begins to fly, the Black Swan and the new White Swan fall in love with each other.

The production ended in real time as the performers began clearing the stage. They rolled up the tarkett flooring, removed their costumes down to flesh-coloured underwear and performed some circus tricks with a Cyr wheel and with hoops. They then began taking various poses while inside movable box-like structures.

From the closing moments of Duck Pond. Photo: © Pia Johnson

The connections with Swan Lake, and even the stories of Andersen, were far from the strongest aspect of the show. The real highlight of Duck Pond was the acrobatic feats of the artists of Circa. It was a treat to watch the flexibility of the artists and their ability to put themselves and their bodies in positions at which we non-acrobats can only gasp. I was impressed too with the acting ability of every performer, whether it was the expressions of love between some of the characters or the humorous activities of the ‘duck army’ sweeping up the feathers that got scattered over the stage floor after the pillow fight. Even the so-called burlesque activities of the performers at the end of the show, as they pushed themselves forward in a sexual manner, were impressive, if somewhat surprising.

A circus moment from Duck Pond. Photo: © Pia Johnson

But I wonder why Swan Lake was taken up by the director Yaron Lifschitz as the apparent focus of the show? The narrative wandered all over the place and was very inconsistent in its references. It made Swan Lake seem like some crazy old story. In my opinion it would have been preferable had Circa made up its own story rather than trying to mess with Swan Lake and other bits and pieces. I have always enjoyed Circa’s productions in the past, but Duck Pond was just a mash-up and turned me in another direction.

Michelle Potter, 20 September 2025

Featured image: Before the performance began the front curtain was lit with the image of a white feather. Photo: Michelle Potter


The handout (program?) that the audience received was far from satisfactory. It was nothing more than a brief synopsis of the action. The information below dealing with costumes, lighting, sound score, cast and so forth was uplifted from elsewhere.

Cast & Creatives
Created by Yaron Lifschitz and the Circa ensemble.

Director, Stage Design Yaron Lifschitz 
Composer and Sound Designer Jethro Woodward
Costume Designer Libby McDonnell 
Lighting Designer Alexander Berlage
Associate Director Marty Evans
Dramaturg/Associate Choreographer Rani Luther 
Voice Over Artist Elise Greig 
Footage of brutal swan fight used with the kind permission of Carl Bovis.
CAST:
Oliver Layher, Tristan St John, Jordan Twartz, Harley Timmermans, Adam Strom, Darby Sullivan, Asha Colless, Anais Stewart, Clara Scudder-Davis, Maya Davies, Sophie Seccombe, Rose Symons

I was a guest of Canberra Theatre Centre at this performance.

Superposition. Gabriel Sinclair and Jazmyn Carter

My review of Superposition was published online by Canberra CityNews on 13 September 2025. The review below is a slightly enlarged version of the CityNews post. Here is a link to the CityNews review.

***********************************

12 September 2025. Courtyard Studio, Canberra Theatre Centre

A new event on the calendar of the Canberra Theatre Centre, a two-week season of new creations across the field of the performing arts, began on 12 September 2025. Called The Independents—Festival of New Work, its first week included a dance duet called Superposition from independent artists Gabriel Sinclair and Jazmyn Carter.

I have to admit that the word ‘superposition’ was not previously part of my vocabulary, but I was curious to know what it might mean in relation to a new dance work with that word as its title. With a little research, I discovered that superposition was basically a scientific term, common in physics and mathematics. It referred to the combination of two distinct physical phenomena of the same type so they coexist with each other. But in a simpler description it might mean placing one object in the position of another to show that the two coincide.

The dance concept was brought to life by Sinclair and Carter. They began their performance in a circle of light projected onto the floor of the Courtyard Studio of the Canberra Theatre Centre by lighting designer Rhiley Winnett. At first the dancers remained in the centre of this small circle of light but, as the work progressed, they began moving to the edges of the circle and back again, with the circle of light expanding and contracting as necessary. Aspects of the lighting design changed slightly on occasions throughout the piece with coloured light briefly shining down on the dancers and affecting the colour of their costumes (and their skin). But the circle remained.

As the work began, the movement showed the dancers’ arms and hands twisting and turning around and across each other. It was small but complex movement done with arms and hands remaining close to the body but never touching. Slowly, very slowly, the movement of the arms became broader and more expansive and the interaction became more intense. But the dancers continued to perform without physical contact. Here was the superposition of the titletwo figures coexisting but not actually connecting.

While the movement was somewhat varied in the speed at which it was performed, and while the complexity of the movement continued throughout without any physical contact, perhaps what gave the performance a particular interest in relation to the concept of superposition was that the dancers were human beings rather than inanimate objects. Occasionally, very occasionally, it seemed that the movement involved a human emotion. This was especially the case with Sinclair’s performance when there were occasions when his face and upper body seemed to be showing some kind of emotion. I got the feeling that he was actually engaging with Carter in a way that was beyond physicality. This doesn’t happen with rocks, waves and other aspects of nature that are often involved in scientific superposition.

A score, created I understand by Gabriel Sinclair, was basically background sound rather than a musical accompaniment. Media notes describe it as a ‘reactive, cybernetic soundscape’. It consisted of a wide variety of sounds, sometimes soft, sometimes loud, sometimes grinding or crashing, but with pretty much everything recalling day to day noises.

For me the work, at approximately 60 minutes, was a little too long. I think the point was made quite early on, although it was quite fascinating to speculate on the remarkable complexity of the movement, and the even more remarkable fact that the dancers never touched each other despite that complexity. But my mind wandered. 

It was the costumes by Leanne Carter that kept me interested. They consisted of long skirts that moved beautifully, and close-fitting, long-sleeved tops that never got in the way of the movement of the hands and arms. Made from an assortment of materials of different patterns and colours, with a strong presence of red, they were a highlight. Thankfully!


Michelle Potter, 13 September 2025.

All images show Gabriel Sinclair and Jazmyn Carter in performance. Photos: © Andrew Sikorski

I was a guest of Canberra Theatre Centre at this performance.

GEMS. L.A. Dance Project

7 September, 2025 (matinee). The Playhouse, Queensland Performing Arts Centre, Brisbane Festival

Brisbane Festival media announcements for Benjamin Millepied’s Gems have frequently stressed that Gems, a work in three parts, reflects George Balanchine’s Jewels, also a three part work. It is an interesting, but perhaps confusing comment. Millepied of course danced with New York City Ballet (NYCB) and I was lucky enough to see him perform with NYCB in Jewels in 2010. Then I was impressed with his dancing in ‘Rubies’, the second section of Jewels. I referred to him in my review as ‘a boisterous Benjamin Millepied’.

Had the media not been so insistent that Millepied’s Gems reflected Balanchine’s Jewels I doubt I would have thought of making a connection. But Gems was not only a work in three parts but was made in collaboration with Van Cleef and Arpels, an upmarket and creative jewellery organisation. Charles Arpels, a co-founder of the company, was in part responsible for the development of Balanchine’s Jewels, so a connection of sorts is not beyond the realms of possibility..

The standout section for me was the second item, ‘Hearts and Arrows’, which Millepied made in 2014. Performed to a selection of music by Philip Glass, with arresting costumes of black tops of various designs with black and white skirts or shorts for the dancers, it showed Millepied’s beautifully constructed choreography that pushed the boundaries of classical dance into a contemporary mode of groupings and poses.

A moment in the section ‘Hearts and Arrows’ from Gems. Photographer not identified.

I was staggered by the brilliant dancing of one of the dancers (unknown to me by name but the tallest of the eight dancers who made up the company on this occasion). The pirouettes, tours en l’air and other airborne steps on view were so well placed and perfectly executed. Just spectacular.

The least arresting section for me was the first item on the program, ‘Reflections’ originally made in 2013 and performed to music by David Lang. It was danced in front of a bright red backcloth with the word STAY emblazoned in white across it, and on a red floorcloth with white writing on it that was hard to see from close up (I was sitting in row F of the stalls). One really needed to be seated upstairs in a gallery seat to look down on the wording.

It was not easy to focus on the choreography when the words seemed to take over (visual concept by Barbara Kruger). The writing on the floorcloth was something about ‘thinking of you’ and program notes say the section concerned ‘presence and absence, desire and memory’. But it would have had more effect I think had the so-called visual concept not pushed the choreography into the background. In addition the costumes were not as theatrical as I would have expected. Those track pants (not seen in the header image but very obvious in Brisbane) were not attractive.

The final section, ‘On the Other Side’, was also performed to a score from Philip Glass and took place in front of backcloth showing an art work by Mark Bradford.

A moment in the section ‘On the Other Side’ from Gems. Photographer not identified.


Program notes say this section traced ‘the bonds between individuals and the quiet strength of collective experience’. It was perhaps a trifle long but it showed Millepied again working with classically trained bodies and making complex groupings, and often focussing on very moving moments of stillness.

A breathtaking moment occurred (more than once too), for example, when one of the dancers took a pose with upper body and head bent back but with one arm stretching forward. The pose was held for several seconds before the dancer folded her body into another pose. Simplicity perfected.

The true highlight of Gems, however, was the exceptional dancing of all eight dancers throughout the three sections. There was quite a bit of ‘grounded’ work, which was something that Balanchine avoided but which is commonplace in contemporary dance. But what stood out was the way the bodies of all eight dancers were managed by Millepied in ways that did to a certain extent recall a Balanchine choreographic mode, but that had been manipulated in quite complex ways to create a new, contemporary look.

Shortly after Balanchine’s Jewels was first presented in New York in 1967 a journalist wrote, ‘Though there’s no important meaning in the fact that Jewels is the “first abstract three-act ballet”, there’s lots of good copy in the phrase.’* I suspect that comparisons between Gems and Jewels is also ‘good copy’, but is perhaps just an unecessary comparison.

The three sections of Gems were put together for the first time for the Brisbane Festival. The work had much to offer in opening up a look at how dance can absorb much, and how in the hands of an exceptional choreographer can be developed into a particularly different mode of expression.

Michelle Potter, 8 September 2025

Featured image: A moment from ‘Reflections’ the first section of Benjamin Millepied’s Gems.


All images used in this review come from internet sources and are not necessarily from the Brisbane performances.

*See the section on Jewels in The International Dictionary of Ballet (Detroit: St James Press, 1993). Volume 1: A-K, p. 721.

I attended Gems as a member of the general public. My ticket cost $120.

Mandolina Ballerina. Canberra Mandolin Orchestra and Tessa Karle

My review of Mandolina Ballerina was published online by Canberra City News on 17 August 2025. That review can be read at this link. The review below is a slightly enlarged version of the City News post.

*********************************

16 August 2025. Folk Dance Canberra, Hackett ACT

Mandolina Ballerina was a somewhat unexpected collaboration between the Canberra Mandolin Orchestra, augmented by the presence of a harp and a double bass, and Canberra-raised Tessa Karle, a former student of Canberra’s Dance Development Centre and currently a dancer with the Wellington-based Royal New Zealand Ballet. The program, which had just two performances on one afternoon, consisted of ten separate, short musical items from various well-known composers. Each item was introduced by conductor Michael Hardy. Four of the musical items included a solo choreographed and danced by Karle.

Canberra Mandolin Orchestra (without harp and double bass). Photo: © Eva Schroeder

First the music. One item, Serenade Espagnole, was written especially for mandolin in 1963 by French composer François Menichetti. The rest, which included short excerpts from well-known ballets such as Swan Lake, Coppélia and Nutcracker, had been arranged for mandolin by Hardy.

With the exception of Serenade Espagnole, which had just the right sound to my ears, the musical excerpts conveyed a quite different impression when played on mandolins rather than by an expanded orchestra. But it was an experience to watch the audience’s reaction. Almost everyone was taken in by the music and people around me, especially older folk, were fully absorbed as they swayed from side to side, or followed the music with waving hands or (silent) tapping of the feet. These reactions were especially noticeable during the playing of Johann Strauss’ Beautiful Blue Danube—that very danceable waltz.

Secondly the venue. Mandolina Ballerina was performed in a small hall in the Canberra suburb of Hackett, a hall used by Folk Dance Canberra for its classes and activities. The hall had a stage, which was not used. The audience was seated in three rows arranged in an untiered semi-circle with the orchestra also on floor level in front of the stage. An open area was set up between the orchestra and the audience with a Tarkett dance floor spread over that space, which became the performing space for Karle.

Thirdly the dancing. The small size of the dance space meant that Karle’s choreography was limited. It could not include, for example, large jumps that moved through the space, or any structure that developed a noticeable floor pattern. The arrangement of seating on a single level also hindered the audience’s view (apart from that of those sitting in the front row) of the choreography. This was especially frustrating in relation to Karle’s performance of Anna Pavlova’s famous solo The Dying Swan, which has sections of the choreography taking place on the floor with the dancing showing the dying moments of the swan. I was seated in the third row and stood up for every dance section so I could see Karle well (including her feet!).

But in the circumstances, Karle’s performance was well worth watching. She has beautifully developed upper body movement and she also managed to inject a particular personality into each of her solos. Her changing emotional responses were perhaps most noticeable in her rendition of the ‘Habanera’ from Georges Bizet’s music for Carmen, which looked very different from, say, her facial expression and carefully considered movement in her performance of ‘Prayer’ to the music of Léo Delibes from Coppélia. Her performance of The Dying Swan, however, received the strongest applause. That particular solo always has a strong resonance for everyone.

In conclusion. Canberra Mandolin Orchestra deserves congratulations for taking on this collaboration. There were various aspects of the show, especially in relation to the dance component and background, that perhaps needed to be thought through in more detail. But, I hope the organisation will continue to work on the idea of collaboration across the arts.

Michelle Potter, 18 August 2025

Featured image: Portrait of Tessa Karle. Photo: © Eva Schroeder


I was a guest of Canberra Mandolin Orchestra at this performance.

Illume. Bangarra Dance Theatre—a second look

25 July 2025. Canberra Theatre Centre

it is an interesting experience watching Illumine for a second time in a different venue and from a different location in the theatre. In Sydney in June my view of the production was from the mid section of the stalls of the Joan Sutherland Theatre. My review of that show is at this link. In Canberra I was in the second row of the stalls. I was practically onstage!

Probably the most intriguing aspect of being so close to the action was not the action itself but the power of the visual aspects of the production. In particular Elizabeth Gadsby’s costumes were quite stunning, especially the white-ish outfits worn towards the end of the production. It was not easy to see Gadsby’s intricacies of patterning from a distance but from my seat in Canberra the costumes were just beautiful to look at. I was also taken in Canberra by the extent of body make-up worn by the dancers, which changed constantly in colour and pattern, and also in the parts of the body on which the make-up was worn. The lighting and various stage effects were also engrossing from close up.

It was also good to see close up the facial expressions of the dancers, which again were not so obvious from the middle to back of the stalls. It gave me a clue to the meaning behind the section with the red boxes that I really didn’t understand all that clearly previously. Given the anxiety on the faces of the dancers I assume now that the section, in which those red boxes were moved back and forth and assembled in different combinations, represented the often-destructive nature of colonisation for First Nations peoples.

In terms of choreography, however, it was easier and more fulfilling to watch from a little further back. Dance is a collaborative art form and the collaborative elements in Illume were very powerful. But in the end, at least in my opinion, the choreography should not be overtaken by aspects of collaboration, which seemed to be happening in this production. And it really shouldn’t matter where one is seated. The choreography matters and is the most significant aspect of a dance production.

Following the Canberra season, as I continued to think about the various aspects of the production, I searched for the meaning of the word ‘Illume’ even though its meaning seemed obvious on one level. But I was not surprised to learn that the word is not in common usage today. The OED says it is used just 0.03 times ‘per million words in modern written English.’ Why title the work with such an obsolete word? Its antonym, or one of them, is put forward as ‘confuse’!

Illume is not an easy production to watch, or understand, or both. It covers several diverse aspects of the life history of the First Nations people of the Dampier Peninsula in Western Australia, but it is just not clear cut as a dance production. The concepts being put before the audience are discussed in the printed program and in Canberra those concepts were also presented in the foyer in a visually powerful and clearly understandable display (the presence of which I didn’t notice in Sydney). But despite displays and written program notes, a dance production should not have to rely strongly on written explanations to give the viewer a clear idea of what a production entails. Such things should be just an addition.

Illume would make a terrific exhibition but as an onstage production it is not Bangarra’s strongest or most illuminating show.

Michelle Potter, 29 July 2025.

Featured image: Dancers of Bangarra Dance Theatre in a section from Illume, 2025 Photo: © Daniel Boud

Home, Land and Sea. Royal New Zealand Ballet (with guests from New Zealand Dance Company)

24 July 2025, St James Theatre, Wellington
reviewed by Jennifer Shennan

The Way Alone—Stephen Baynes/P. Tchaikovsky
Chrysalis—Shaun James Kelly/Philip Glass
Home, Land and Sea—Moss Te Ururangi Patterson/Shayne Carter

This triple bill hits the mark in more ways than three. Production values and galvanised performances reveal the company in high morale, with the artistic management in steady yet adventurous command. The dancers and the audience are stimulated by the contrasts of aesthetics, musicality and substance of the three works.

Choreographer Stephen Baynes has a career-long association with Australian Ballet, although his works are also in repertoires of companies worldwide. The Way Alone was commissioned in 2008 by Hong Kong Ballet for an all-Tchaikovsky program, and uses excerpts from lesser known compositions of choral, organ and piano forces that create a meditative atmosphere. 13 dancers form the ensemble, which divides into duos and trios and an occasional solo, where Katherine Minor has a notable role. The theme is clued in the title—members may be part of a large group but at the same time remain as individuals, as in a church congregation for example, or a theatre audience, together alone. There is a lyrical and serene quality to the movement, all effort is hidden, with lifts and upreaching gestures suggesting that gravity has no hold here. Eye contact is made with the audience only at the end. The work is beautifully danced throughout, and the lighting design by Jon Buswell shines beams of soft light from on high, to heavenly effect.

Dancers of Royal New Zealand Ballet in a scene from The Way Alone. Photo: © Stephen A’Court.

Shaun James Kelly is a dancer and resident choreographer at RNZB. In this premiere, Chrysalis, he collaborates with designer Rory William Docherty to explore the metaphor of layered clothing, what that might say of a person wearing it, or be revealed as layers are removed. The work opens with a tribute to Shaun’s parents and the longevity of their relationship. Hats and coats are styled for 1950s, soon removed then placed on coathangers that are raised high above the stage—suggesting the passing of time and changing of fashions. Party attire is worn and enjoyed … these layers too are removed and lifted away, revealing bodytights in various shades of nacreous lustre. The work is set to piano music by Philip Glass, with minimalist motifs repeated to build effect. Several short passages are danced in silence which suggests that sound too can be layered. Danced connections between couples and friends reference the value in personal freedom and the confidence to express gender identity. The cast of ten dancers move with style and commitment in the combination of familiar and new ballet vocabulary, and Shaun will have been rightly pleased that his work is delivered with such aplomb.

Katherine Minor and Kihiro Kusukami in Chrysalis. Photo: © Stephen A’Court

Home, Land and Sea, another premiere, brings the choreography of Moss Patterson to a new level of urgency. Shayne Carter, highly regarded for his performing and composing in a wide-ranging musical scene, has created a richly evocative music score with natural landscapes and Maori cultural references drawn in. His strong composition drives this highly successful collaboration, and his program notes on the experience of working with dancers are among the best you will read.

The cast comprises six RNZB dancers with six members of New Zealand Dance Company in a combination that melds their classical and contemporary dance trainings. These were never opposite techniques but the give and take between them can produce versatility in some dancers, most notably seen here in the intensely invested performances by Zacharie Dun, Kirby Selchow and Ana Gallardo Lobaina.

Dancers from Royal New Zealand Ballet and New Zealand Dance Company in a scene from Home, Land and Sea. Photo: © Stephen A’Court.
Stella Clarkson from New Zealand Dance Company and Ana Gallardo Lobaina from Royal New Zealand Ballet in a moment from Home, Land and Sea. Photo: © Stephen A’Court.

At times the dance pace is relentless but its effect is always controlled and tempered. It is maintained not because shouting achieves anything but rather, because momentum is everything and there’s important work to be done. There is in the choreography an aspect of polemic against the country’s current troubling political shifts that demote Maori needs, that lessen respect accorded to the Treaty of Waitangi as the nation’s founding reference, that downgrade the status of te reo (language), that disestablish positions of government historians, and more besides.

Politicians we could name should see this work and reflect on the divisive and mean-spirited ways they are trying to attract support for policies that move us backwards not forwards in the essential quest for intercultural respect and connection. It’s doubtful of course if they’d get anything out of it since folk mostly hear only what they want to hear, so better to save the resources and ensure instead that a quality film is made of this work. Alun Bollinger or Chris Graves on camera would know how to capture that. This is choreography that offers dialogue and conversation. Film can reach far beyond a company’s touring itinerary, and ours is not the only country that needs to raise and pursue awareness of such challenges.

Ka nui te aroha mo tēnei tūtaki. (Let’s recognise this title work as an important bi-cultural encounter). The power of haka and the poetry of ballet are complementary and it’s Patterson’s and Carter’s shared triumph to have presented a template for mutual exchange, not confrontation or competition. Jon Buswell’s design uses a set of panels onto which are first projected harakeke/flax weaving patterns, then grasses in the wind, to scenes of the sea, with its foam rising, which discreetly but miraculously slowly turns into a long white cloud, and there you have it, Ao-tea-roa, the name of the country we live in.

There is an interesting list of the times, starting in 1953, that New Zealand’s ballet company has looked for echoes between ballet and Maori dance, but that account lies outside the scope of this review.

I found it very affecting that Patterson uses a dynamic range of movement harnessing at times the power of haka and merging it with the clarity of alignment in classically trained dancers. He waits till near the end to include stylized versions of ringa (hand and arm movement) that characterise Maori dance, delivered in miniature with carved clarity by all the dancers. He then moves towards the work’s peace-making denouement by using the exquisite wiri (the shimmering quivering of arms and hands) that signal the life force in Maori worldview.

The curtain call remains in character—a linked line of dancers rippling as waves of the sea. Such a cadence is worth more to me than perhaps it sounds, and I wish that happened more often. It in turn evokes Wislawa Symborska’s famous poem, Theatre Impressions, in which, despite any preceding scenes of heroic struggle or battle, it’s the curtain call that grabs you by the throat.

Dancers from Royal New Zealand Ballet and New Zealand Dance Company taking a curtain call in Home, Land and Sea. Photo: © Stephen A’Court

Home, Land and Sea, with that talisman curtain call, shows a way that ballet can do its work, in a relevant time and place. Hei konei rā (For here, there).

Jennifer Shennan, 26 July 2025

Postscript: In the interval I learned in a text of the passing of Philippa Ward, well-known and much-loved Wellington pianist and dance aficionado. (She had been rehearsal pianist for the Stravinsky Pulcinella I choreographed 40 years ago, and remembered details of that production all these decades since. Such appreciation of an ephemeral art is rare.) No choreographer could synchronise this timing but Baynes may be moved to learn that Philippa quietly departed as Tchaikovsky piano music was being played in The Way Alone. This is another of the ways ballet can do its work. JS

Featured image: Ana Gallardo Lobaina and Zacharie Dun in The Way Alone. Photo: © Stephen A’Court

Ondine (2009). The Royal Ballet

via the ROH streaming platform

While I was quite aware that Frederick Ashton had created Ondine back in 1958 specifically to feature Margot Fonteyn, before watching the recently released stream of a 2008/2009 production of that work I went to David Vaughan’s book, Frederick Ashton and his ballets, to see what Vaughan had written about it. Vaughan, in his usual informative and very readable manner, gives an explanation of how the work evolved and, in particular, the role of composer Hans Werne Henze. But despite the discussion by Vaughan, along with various other writings about the work, I found it very hard to watch to the end of what is a three act ballet of (to my mind) dubious quality.

Ashton chose to base his work on the novel Undine by Friedrich de la Motte Fouqué, with a few changes including to the names of the leading characters: Undine the water sprite became Ondine; Hullbrand the gentleman who falls in love with Ondine became Palemon; Bertalda the woman whom Palemon eventually married (despite earlier being married by a hermit to Ondine) became Berta; and the Lord of the Mediterranean Sea was changed from Uncle Kuhleborn to Tirrenio. Basically the ballet tells of the fate, death to be specific, that awaits Palemon when he declares that his true love is for Ondine rather than Berta.1

In the streamed production Miyako Yoshida danced the role of Ondine and seemed smilingly dispassionate, perhaps rather unsubtle; Genesia Rosato was a somewhat haughty Berta; Tirrenio was danced with conviction by Ricardo Cervera; and the Hermit who presided over the marriage of Palemon and Ondine, was strongly and memorably performed by Gary Avis, even though it was quite a small role.

But the standout performance came from Edward Watson as Palemon. Especially remarkable was his solo in Act III when he sees a vision of Ondine prior to being involved in the fateful kiss that brings his life to an end. Watson’s acting and dancing was exceptional throughout but the last solo was absolutely engrossing. What was thrilling to watch was not simply the steps, which were beautifully formed and placed, but the way in which Watson’s entire body was involved at every moment. It was a perfect physical engagement.

But the narrative was  far from  perfect. Who exactly was Palemon?  Why did he live in a castle? And similarly who was Berta, who also apparently lived in a castle? Perhaps I needed to have read the book first? Then as we moved to Act II, why did Ondine and Palemon board a ship. Where were they going? Then as Act III began there were similarities with certain acts of well-known ballets, Sleeping Beauty for example, as Berta and Palemon sat to watch divertissements in celebration of their marriage. But somehow Hans Werner Henze’s score seemed too ‘modernist’ for this kind of activity.

I guess I was disappointed with so much of the production including, in addition to my remarks above, some of the choreography such as that line of dancers (sailors on board that ship going somewhere) swaying back and forth to represent the waves. It was just too superficial. Such a disappointment from Ashton really.

Michelle Potter, 25 July 2025

1. David Vaughan gives a useful outline of the story in Frederick Ashton and his ballets, pp. 444-445

Featured image: Detail (full image below) of Miyako Yoshida in a moment from Act I of Ondine. (Image from the ROH website—a still from the film?)